A practical commercial roofing plan for Frankel City properties separates urgent leak control from repair, coating, maintenance, and replacement decisions supported by photos and condition findings. Frankel City was built as an oil company camp decades ago, and like most of those camps scattered across Andrews County, the original townsite is mostly gone. What's left standing is the field infrastructure serving the leases that made the camp worth building in the first place, and that infrastructure is what we work on when we're out here.
The camp was built to house workers when a major operator ran these leases, back when putting employees on-site made more sense than commuting them in from Andrews or Odessa. As operations modernized and companies stopped housing crews on location, the camp housing came down or was hauled off, piece by piece, over the decades that followed.
What didn't leave is the field itself. The leases kept producing, operators changed hands more than once, and the buildings still standing are the ones the field actually needs: pump equipment sheds, gathering system infrastructure, and small maintenance buildings for whoever currently pumps these wells.
The building stock at Frankel City today is almost entirely functional and almost entirely small. Pump jack service buildings and doghouses shelter wellhead equipment. Small compressor skids carry basic shelters over controls. Chemical treating buildings and meter runs add a handful of enclosed roofs across the lease network, usually visited by a pumper making rounds rather than staffed daily.
None of it was built to last as long as it has. A lot of what's standing dates back further than the current operator's ownership of the lease, which means roof systems here are frequently older than the paperwork tracking who's responsible for them.
Because a lot of this stock is a hand-me-down from an earlier era of the field, replacement isn't always the first answer. A shed built to house one generation of wellhead equipment often gets repurposed for whatever the current operator needs on that pad, and the roof over it has to keep working through that change of use even though nobody designed it with a second purpose in mind. We look at what a building is actually being used for now, not what it was built for originally, before recommending a fix.
The issues we find at Frankel City reflect both the age of the buildings and how rarely anyone looks at them closely:
Rust-through on old galvanized panels is the single most common finding, and a lot of it is a good candidate for silicone coating rather than full replacement, provided the substrate underneath is still sound enough to hold a coating.
The biggest risk factor at Frankel City isn't the age of the buildings, it's how infrequently anyone lays eyes on them. A pumper's route might pass a given shed once every few days, focused on wellhead readings and not roof condition, and a small leak or a loosened panel can run for a long stretch before it becomes a bigger repair or a downed piece of equipment.
We push periodic roof-specific inspection for exactly this reason. A field building that only gets a roof look once a year, timed around scheduled maintenance rather than left to chance, catches problems while they're still a coating job instead of a full re-roof.
There's no lodging, no local supply house, and nothing resembling a town left at Frankel City, so a crew brings everything it needs for the day. Access runs through whichever operator currently holds the lease, and because ownership here has changed hands more than once, we confirm current lease contacts before scheduling rather than assuming last year's access still applies.
Some of the infrastructure sitting close together out here belongs to different operators entirely, so we're careful about which lease boundary we're working inside before a crew sets foot on a roof.
Material selection matters more here than on a building someone drives past daily. We favor systems that hold up with minimal attention over long stretches between visits rather than anything that needs regular maintenance to perform, because a coating or panel system that needs yearly upkeep on a shed nobody visits yearly is the wrong choice no matter how it performs on paper.
No, not in any functional sense. The camp housing is gone. What remains is field infrastructure serving the leases in the area.
It depends on the building's condition. A lot of what we find is a sound candidate for coating or targeted panel replacement rather than a full tear-off.
We confirm current ownership and access before scheduling any work, since these leases have changed hands more than once over the years.
Yes, if the substrate is still structurally sound. We test that before recommending a coating over full replacement.
At minimum once a year, timed to scheduled maintenance visits, since these buildings otherwise go long stretches without anyone checking the roof specifically.